Penguins, people and the word
Stephen Curkpatrick


The word of God is greater than the world—heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away. The word exceeds the world in durability because each generation of the earth dies. Even the supposition that the earth is eternal is contingent on a continuous cycle of death, regeneration and death.

The world is always passing away. Its life, whether plant or animal, depends on the death of other life for nutrition and space. Life upsurges from the earth only to recede back into the earth again. Meaning is sought within the cycle of biological life, even as humans search for a word that will endure beyond flux.

The word exceeds the world because it is the source of all life from the beginning. The earth pulls back to oblivion, every particular instance of life that has emerged to visibility; the earth takes away as readily as it gives in an organic play of life trumped by death. Every singular expression of life ends in death. Life formed from the earth is contingent on death.

The world was first called into existence by the word. The volitional decisions and responsibilities that the word of God invoke and call forth are more durable than biological life formed from the earth.

The time of decision is momentary but established eternally as a response to the word. This reality exceeds the earth and its organic rhythm of growth and decay in which emerging life cannibalises previous life and any meaning derived from it.

v

Scripture presents God as creator who is personal as volitional. These affirmations of biblical testimony were central to Christian identity in distinction from the biological prison of fate within paganism. People were liberated by the vocative story of God in Israel and Christian gospel in contrast to fateful perspectives in which an aspect of creation or life, for all its extravagance as a gift, was confused with the giver of creation and life.

As creator, God is distinct from creation, yet intimately present as its source of possibility and meaning. Affirmation of God as sovereign creator and vocative in call and encounter, who sends sunshine and rain on the good and evil alike, gives a consistent and reliable context for human volition and responsibility.

Human freedom is enshrined in biblical testimony as the possibility of love, responsible decisions and acts of goodness. If nature generates adversity for humans, these are expressions of slight variation within consistent recurrences of nature.

God is creator and personal as volitional. The gift of creation can therefore be engaged with confident freedom toward the dignity of responsible life in response to the God-breathed word that calls forth human existence. For Christians, God’s definitive disclosure in Jesus Christ makes this volitional focus wholly evident.

Biblical elevation of human status as privileged within creation is accused of promoting a destructive view of nature. This can seem plausible when images of nature’s demise are framed with hostile intent, accusing Christians of promoting a view that is destroying the earth. Yet this approach fails to recognise that biblical testimony also speaks of human compromise or sin that is expressed as hubris and which, in expressions of rapacious greed, ravages creation.

When Christians reject the biblical elevation of human life in mistaken advocacy for an organic spirituality of creation as a divine entity, they forfeit human distinctiveness in God’s image and merge humans into a seamless identity with all life. This is to conflate Christian faith with an ancient and contemporary pagan procedure.

In a closed circle of reference between nature and culture, ethical values are selected and attributed to imperatives perceived to upsurge from the earth; their mystical spirituality is then cited as an authority for these imperatives. This procedure is full of folly.

If experience of nature and cultural values forged from natural phenomena form diverse ethical possibilities that are given spiritual legitimacy, such legitimacy was first forged from selected criteria—benign from nature and amenable as assorted cultural bric-a-brac.

Selected examples of nature may give images of social cooperation, such as emperor penguins huddled together in a blizzard, reshuffling their relative formation for the sake of all against harsh elements. Yet values derived from animal instinct are naked of anything beyond survival of the species or the fittest, however elegantly this is expressed in selective portrayals of nature.

Humans are distinctive within creation; they can choose to live above survival of the fittest or the preservation of a species, both of which occur pervasively at the cost of other life and species.

If humans are not distinctive within creation, there is no reason for human ethics to be distinguished from biological life, which endorses violent survival of the fittest and cannibalisation of previous life. When merged with the earth without definition by the vocative and personal word, there is also no basis to posit either human capacity for sin and evil within distinctive freedom or redemptive transformation as another possibility for human life.

To jettison the biblical elevation of humans within creation in a mistaken belief that humanity is dignified and the earth is thereby protected, is to diminish both human dignity and the gift of creation.

The will of God in biblical testimony is disclosed as possibilities engaged through personal decisions toward responsibility and accountability in response to the word—beyond the recurrences and instincts of natural phenomena and variegated cultural values conjured from these. God by the word is the source of creation and the world of time in which we experience this gift as delight in the giver and not as the ultimate source of our existence.

v

The word is greater than the world in giving time to the world. Time is not a problem to be overcome, to which it has been reduced in two opposite theses. In one thesis, time stretches and divides existence, generating differences, which is conducive to diversity. In an opposite thesis, time gathers existence, gradually assimilating differences, which is conducive to unity. Time divides or time assimilates. Both are affirmed in perspectives of life formed from the earth as a closed reality, with perpetual contests over their implications, either toward fragmentation or toward uniformity.

The word gives time to the world. Time is not given to divide existence as endless differences or to assimilate everything to one particular totality of existence. The word that gives time by calling for response is relational—it gathers even as it sustains uniqueness—neither inexorable difference nor incremental assimilation in time. The word calls forth our response as relational in also being unique before God in response to the word.

The word awaits our response; time exists because the word is vocative from the beginning. Without the word of God, there is no time for creation because nothing is initiated and no response is invoked. Without the word informing us of its created source, the earth remains an endless recurrence of repetitions without meaning.

The word calls for response within creation that was first given by the word. The word of God gives time within creation because it calls into being the possibility of volitional response and vocation. There is always a gap between the creative word of God in creation and human response in time. In this gap, every possible thing can happen in the human freedom to respond. (Apropos Marion)

The word is greater than the world, for Christ, the expressive and intimate word of God from the beginning displays the glory of God that is full of grace and truth. Creation remains the context in time within which we can respond to God with gratitude, yet without forging from an excess of gifts, either material or mystical idols that stymie grace and in doing so, destroy gifts that are declared good.

 

Selected sources: Marion Being Given; In Excess.