Reflections in a hall of mirrors
Stephen Curkpatrick


To reflect on one’s reflections about life, to look into the looking person and to observe observing might appear to yield self-understanding in a movement toward knowing oneself. Yet this activity can recede ad infinitum, so that in observing the observer, we also become observers of observing our observing and further, observers of these observations and so on.

Humans have a unique capacity for thinking, deciding and relating; they are reflective. They can reflect on how they think, decide and relate. This is reflexivity. Humans do this in various ways throughout life. In many circumstances, it is useful to reflect on how thinking, deciding and relating have occurred or can occur.

Reflexivity or the capacity for self-reflection is inseparable from a sense of identity. Yet this capacity also inducts us into a hall of mirrors in which we can never finally identify the observer who observes the self reflecting on the self. In quest of an essential self, reflection on reflection is unable to be terminated at a self that is wholly present to the self because humans are not self-standing entities. They exist otherwise than to themselves.

Observing the phenomenon of the self in a maze of mirrors—of reflections on reflections—is not new in human experience. It is the final default resolution for seeking the self amid numerous cul-de-sacs everywhere encountered in quest of the human self.

v

God is the source of human existence; therefore humans have inklings of depth to their existence. This both haunts them and compels them to probe this depth in quest of an essential sense of the self—in the world, among others and finally, in themselves.

Creation is a gift in which exploration of inklings for God can be pursued in the experience of wonder and gratitude. Yet without the giver being known, the passion for such inklings turns into some form of idolatry in which the self becomes confused with phenomena. Humans have a sense of being more than they can put a finger on in the vanity of pursuing and exalting any number of activities under the sun. For the writer of Ecclesiastes, these do not yield the self-affirmations for which humans search.

Humans are conscious of being mortal and living toward a horizon of death. The flux of natural phenomena everywhere reminds them of the struggle to survive in the face of an inexorable but unknown time of death. With an ability to reflect on death, humans are anxious to secure more time before losing to this looming event, the self and any narrative coherence it has achieved.

Life in community is sought as a positive experience because humans are created for relationships, responsibility and a sense of vocation beyond the self. Yet this is also frustrated by the human propensity to compromise goodness, to prevaricate over truth and in anxiety over securing a place under the sun, to scuttle relationships in pursuit of a tribal or partisan perspective of the human self and its deputed essential status among others.

Religion promises a stable perspective of the self as it utilises creation, community and human life as sites of self-awareness. Yet religion conceals the constructed or reflexive sources of its self-evident assertions in which an array of inklings about the self are endorsed, either as divine decrees or as expressions of the self as divine. Among religions, conflicting images of the human self—spiritually concave and convex—generate endless reflections that are never stabilised to give an accurate reflection.

Advocacy for religious equivalence merely endorses reality as a veritable kaleidoscope that gives diverse perspectives but no truth and therefore grace. Ironically, any possibility that life is coherent in truth and experienced as gift in grace is terminated by religion. Aesthetic foci only intensify this as they multiply perspectives.

Within the myriad resources of creation, culture and community, humans in search of an essential reflection of the self within the flux of life are finally resolved to scrutinize the one place where no phenomenon or person is duplicated—the self. Yet we can become hopelessly lost in pursuing a durable sense of identity in this ultimate hall of mirrors. Without community or creation that is qualified by definitive grace and truth, the gaze within can become a nightmare maze of endless reflections of reflections.

In the self, potentially the smallest space of creation, humans are caught in an infinite regression of mirrors (mise en abyme), unless this reflexive spell can be broken, decisively, as with a hammer.

v

Christian testimony recognises that humans, in presuming to be wise become fools, distorting any possibility of seeing themselves in an integral profile of themselves. Focusing on themselves, humans generate endless possibilities that effectively distend and eventually destroy any stable or durable locale of the self’s coherence.

Humans cannot know themselves without being addressed otherwise than from their own presumed possibilities. In Israel, it is the call to distinction within righteousness as a relational gift and promise toward responsible vocation for the nations. This call is given ultimate expression in the disclosure of Jesus Christ as the glory of God’s grace and truth. Humanity can here see itself in a singular mirror and not in a kaleidoscope of self-reflexive mirrors.

In order truly to know the self, illusions generated within the human maze of mirrors are necessarily shattered; the conceit of self-determination without compromise must be broken. This takes the initiative of God in Christ experiencing passion and resurrection to demonstrate that the horizon of human existence is not death but life and that the self is not the primary site of meaning.

Through the passion, God in Christ draws humanity into the orbit of death and resurrection where mirrors of deceptive self-enchantment are smashed. The human self is encountered in another, who, uncompromised in grace and truth, gives the possibility of experiencing life beyond any quest to discover integral identity in projects of self-surveillance and reconstruction.

The complexity of variegated reflections of human existence and their corresponding illusions are so powerful that the human hall of mirrors cannot be shattered by humans alone. Therefore, the way to self-understanding in Christian faith is a paradox.

Christian testimony points to the definitive human form, Jesus Christ, who in self-relinquishing love, invites us to die in order to experience life that exceeds deathly anxiety in his risen life. Losing self to find a true self—to die in order to live—is counter-intuitive for humans, yet central to Christian faith and experience of integral human existence as a gift in the Spirit of Christ. This is the premise for living out a cohesive narrative of the self as known and loved, with every reason for joy amid the excess gifts of God.

v

Grace and truth that speak definitively to human existence disclose the glory of God’s character, which is given unequivocal expression in Jesus Christ. This does not replicate the various reflections posited as points of reference in human self-searching or religious perspective. Jesus Christ is the singular reflection of the character and glory of God in grace and truth. This is not known in quest of the self but in relinquishing the self as a necessary death resourced by grace, in faith that Christ is the true image and dynamic source of integral human life and dignity. This is only heard through the word of God and received as a gift in grace.

The self as a hall of mirrors is necessarily assaulted and the possibility of looking elsewhere offered. This can only occur in the word of God’s grace and truth beyond any human aspiration to secure the human form amid myriad reflections—cultural, religious and political. In one counter-intuitive mirror of humanity, humans through faith can begin to reflect on their true possibilities in Christ.